[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181113085424.GC25808@8bytes.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 09:54:24 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Christian Kellner <ckellner@...hat.com>,
Mario.Limonciello@...l.com,
Anthony Wong <anthony.wong@...onical.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PCI / iommu / thunderbolt: IOMMU based DMA protection
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 07:06:24PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Lu Baolu (1):
> iommu/vt-d: Force IOMMU on for platform opt in hint
>
> Mika Westerberg (3):
> PCI / ACPI: Identify external PCI devices
> iommu/vt-d: Do not enable ATS for external devices
> thunderbolt: Export IOMMU based DMA protection support to userspace
Looks good to me. Which tree should go this trough? In case its not the
IOMMU tree, for the iommu-parts:
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Thanks,
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists