linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 00/14] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Nov 2018 02:10:34 -0800
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     frowand.list@...il.com
Cc:     shuah@...nel.org, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>, mcgrof@...nel.org,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, mpe@...erman.id.au,
        joe@...ches.com, brakmo@...com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        Tim.Bird@...y.com, khilman@...libre.com,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        jdike@...toit.com, richard@....at, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
        kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/14] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit
 testing framework

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 9:46 AM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/6/18 5:17 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:23 AM Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Brendan,
> > <snip>
> >> Framework looks good. I think it would be helpful to include a real test
> >
> > Great to hear!
> >
> >> in the patch series to get a feel for how effective it is.
> >
> > Alright, will do. Rob suggested converting
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.19/source/drivers/of/unittest.c to
> > KUnit, so that might offer a good comparison.
>
> drivers/of/unittest.c might be a bit bigger and more complex test than
> you want to start with.

I already got it working under KUnit. Admittedly, structurally it is
not so different, so it will require some work to make it pretty.

I think now it is a question of whether you want me to start here or not.

Probably best just to share what I have now along with Shuah's
requested changes and we can go from there.

Let me know what you think.

Cheers