[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181113115708.GE10502@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:57:08 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: wang.yi59@....com.cn
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhong.weidong@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Fix -Wmissing-prototypes warning for init_IRQ()
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 07:31:44PM +0800, wang.yi59@....com.cn wrote:
> I thought this can keep patches dependent and can be reverted easily if one
> of them has something wrong.
Same thing with per-directory or subsystem - just less granulary.
> Thanks for your suggestion, I will do as you advised. :-)
Yeah, this was just an idea. Let's see how it really works out.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists