linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] media: sunxi: Add A10 CSI driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:37:08 +0100
From:   Hans Verkuil <hansverk@...co.com>
To:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] media: sunxi: Add A10 CSI driver

On 11/13/18 13:48, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:25 AM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> 
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun4i-csi/sun4i_csi.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,275 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> 
> According to Documentation/process/license-rules.rst this should be:
> 
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> 
> Same applies to other places in this patch.
> 

Actually, LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 has GPL-2.0-or-later
as a valid license:

Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later

Personally I very much prefer GPL-2.0-or-later since I think it is
much clearer.

Regards,

	Hans