linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 1/5] x86/boot: Add efi_get_rsdp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181113015730.GB7453@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Tue, 13 Nov 2018 09:57:30 +0800
From:   Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
        <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
        <keescook@...omium.org>, <bhe@...hat.com>, <msys.mizuma@...il.com>,
        <indou.takao@...fujitsu.com>, <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/5] x86/boot: Add efi_get_rsdp_addr() to dig out
 RSDP from EFI table

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 03:54:33PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 05:46:41PM +0800, Chao Fan wrote:
>> In order to parse SRAT table and get memory information, RSDP pointer
>> should be found. In kernel, there are three methods to get RSDP:
>> EFI condition, BIOS condition and KEXEC condition. The first works
>> for EFI condition.
>
>"condition"?
>
>Also, please explain shortly what all those abbreviations mean: think
>of a person reading your commit message who doesn't have any clue from
>ACPI.

I will try to improve in next version.
>
>> Imitate ACPI code and EFI code to dig RSDP pointer from EFI tables.
>> Process: boot_param->systab->efi_config_table->RSDP.
>> Based on efi_init(), efi_config_init(), efi_config_parse_tables().
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpitb.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 96 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpitb.c
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpitb.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpitb.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..56b54b0e0889
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpitb.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +#define BOOT_CTYPE_H
>> +#include "misc.h"
>> +#include "error.h"
>> +
>> +#include <linux/efi.h>
>> +#include <asm/efi.h>
>> +#include <linux/numa.h>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> +
>> +/* Search EFI table for RSDP table. */
>> +static void efi_get_rsdp_addr(acpi_physical_address *rsdp_addr)
>
>This is just silly: the function returns void and has a single parameter
>which is an *output* parameter?!
>
>Why isn't the signature
>
>static acpi_physical_address *efi_get_rsdp_addr(void)
>
>instead?

I will change the function style.

>
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
>> +	efi_system_table_t *systab;
>> +	bool efi_64 = false;
>
>You're setting it below already, why here too?

I will drop.

>
>> +	void *config_tables;
>> +	struct efi_info *e;
>> +	char *sig;
>> +	int size;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	e = &boot_params->efi_info;
>> +	sig = (char *)&e->efi_loader_signature;
>> +
>> +	if (!strncmp(sig, EFI64_LOADER_SIGNATURE, 4))
>> +		efi_64 = true;
>> +	else if (!strncmp(sig, EFI32_LOADER_SIGNATURE, 4))
>> +		efi_64 = false;
>> +	else {
>> +		debug_putstr("Wrong EFI loader signature.\n");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Get systab from boot params. Based on efi_init(). */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> +	systab = (efi_system_table_t *)(
>> +			e->efi_systab | ((__u64)e->efi_systab_hi<<32));
>
>No ugly line breaks with open braces trailing like that, pls - just let
>it stick out.

Thanks for this suggestion.

>
>> +#else
>> +	if (e->efi_systab_hi || e->efi_memmap_hi) {
>> +		debug_putstr("Table located above 4GB. EFI should be disabled.\n");
>
>You need to say here what really happens here:
>
>		debug_putstr("Error getting RSDP address: EFI system table located above 4GB.\n");
>
>The same below.

I will change all the all the same message.
>
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +	systab = (efi_system_table_t *)e->efi_systab;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +	if (!systab)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Get EFI tables from systab. Based on efi_config_init() and
>> +	 * efi_config_parse_tables(). Only dig out the config_table.
>> +	 */
>> +	size = efi_64 ? sizeof(efi_config_table_64_t) :
>> +			sizeof(efi_config_table_32_t);
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < systab->nr_tables; i++) {
>> +		efi_guid_t guid;
>> +		unsigned long table;
>
>Put the void *config_tables declaration here.

OK.

>
>> +
>> +		config_tables = (void *)(systab->tables + size * i);
>> +		if (efi_64) {
>> +			efi_config_table_64_t *tmp_table;
>> +
>> +			tmp_table = (efi_config_table_64_t *)config_tables;
>> +			guid = tmp_table->guid;
>> +			table = tmp_table->table;
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
>
>Above you have CONFIG_X86_64, here CONFIG_64BIT. Please use one only.
>
>Also, use IS_ENABLED() instead.

OK.

>
>> +			if (table >> 32) {
>> +				debug_putstr("Table located above 4G. EFI should be disabled.\n");
>> +				return;
>> +			}
>> +#endif
>> +		} else {
>> +			efi_config_table_32_t *tmp_table;
>> +
>> +			tmp_table = (efi_config_table_32_t *)config_tables;
>> +			guid = tmp_table->guid;
>> +			table = tmp_table->table;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Get RSDP from EFI tables.
>> +		 * If ACPI20 table found, use it.
>> +		 * If ACPI20 table not found, but ACPI table found,
>> +		 * use the ACPI table.
>> +		 */
>
>That comment is the opposite of what the code does. Also, why is that
>comment needed at all? If anything, it should say *why* ACPI_TABLE_GUID
>is preferred and then the fallback to ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID is done - not
>*what* it does. That's easily visible in the code.

I will drop the comment.

Thanks,
Chao Fan
>
>Thx.
>
>-- 
>Regards/Gruss,
>    Boris.
>
>Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
>
>