linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/15] Platform: OLPC: Remove an unused include

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5a4c548be4cf9fb3fb6ce5128d6780eea3005215.camel@v3.sk>
Date:   Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:59:18 +0100
From:   Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        quozl@...top.org, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] Platform: OLPC: Remove an unused include

Hi,

thank you for the response.

On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 16:05 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:23 PM Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
> wrote:
> > Also, the header is x86 specific, while there are non-x86 OLPC
> > machines.
> 
> Same concern. as per patch 2.

Which concern? If it's that it doesn't make sense in that particular
place in the patch set, then I don't think so; this header is
unnecessary and the patch has no other dependencies. But the changes
that enable the OLPC EC platform code depend on this.

> Also, you might want to sort headers in alphabetical order.

But should I? Doing so in the same commit would obscure the actual
change, and a separate commit would needlessly clobber git annotate.

Thank you
Lubo

> > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
> > ---
> >  drivers/platform/olpc/olpc-ec.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/olpc/olpc-ec.c
> > b/drivers/platform/olpc/olpc-ec.c
> > index f99b183d5296..35a21c66cd0d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/olpc/olpc-ec.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/olpc/olpc-ec.c
> > @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/list.h>
> >  #include <linux/olpc-ec.h>
> > -#include <asm/olpc.h>
> > 
> >  struct ec_cmd_desc {
> >         u8 cmd;
> > --
> > 2.19.0
> > 
> 
>