[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1542119044.hos5gz4vi8.naveen@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:56:07 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] powerpc64/ftrace: Drop pointless static qualifier
in is_b_op()
YueHaibing wrote:
> There is no need to have the 'intoffset' variable static since new value
> always be assigned before use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index 4bf051d..65248d4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int is_b_op(unsigned int op)
>
> static unsigned long find_bl_target(unsigned long ip, unsigned int op)
> {
> - static int offset;
> + int offset;
That seems to go all the way back to the original commit by Steven.
Good catch.
Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
- Naveen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists