[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181113154647.06900549@windsurf>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:46:47 +0100
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hansverk@...co.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] media: sunxi: Add A10 CSI driver
Hello,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:13:09 -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Actually, LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 has GPL-2.0-or-later
> > as a valid license:
> >
> > Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> >
> > Personally I very much prefer GPL-2.0-or-later since I think it is
> > much clearer.
>
> I saw feedback from Greg to use the SPDX style from
> Documentation/process/license-rules.rst.
>
> Please check:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/10/232
According to https://spdx.org/licenses/, i.e the reference SPDX site,
GPL-2.0-or-later is the right thing to use, and GPL-2.0+ is
"deprecated". But apparently Greg's feedback is "let's not used the
SDPX style, as we don't want to change this all over".
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists