lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJiuCcc1dh9CYO1QcTUOfUPZdjZng80GX=0PiX+cQQ-m4=vq_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:59:09 +0100
From:   Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
To:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc:     martin@...ser.cx, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: i.MX25: add the clocks for the EPIT blocks

Hi Shawn,

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 15:42, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 10:12:30AM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thus wrote Shawn Guo (shawnguo@...nel.org):
> >
> > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 06:32:47PM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> > > > The i.MX25 contains two EPIT (Enhanced Periodic Interrupt Timer)
> > > > function blocks. Add their ipg and per clocks to the device tree.
> >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
Acked-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
> >
> > > Are these EPIT devices actually used in upstream kernel, or just
> > > somewhere else?
> >
> > Until I saw Vladimir's mail this morning, I wasn't aware of any mainline
> > driver that's using the EPIT devices. I found that the clocks are
> > missing when I tried to use EPIT with a company-internal driver that's
> > not suitable for mainline integration.
> >
> > Still, I think that merging this patch does no harm. If the EPIT devices
> > are present in the DT, we should add all resources they're using.
>
> Agreed.  I will be happy to apply the patch if I can get an ACK from
> Clément saying this works with his driver in upstreaming.

I have paused the dev of this driver for now, but this is fine for me.

Regards,
Clement

>
> Shawn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ