[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181113165519.GA4752@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:55:19 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc:     "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        "Struk, Tadeusz" <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Microchip (AT91) SoC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] Removed nested TPM operations
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:30:55PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > 
> > [was Detach TPM space code out of the tpm_transmit() flow but the scope
> > expanded a bit.]
> 
> I believe you making this series artificially large we can merge the
> first 4 patches and leave the rest for further discussion.
1/17, 2/17 and 3/17 are fairly obvious changes but they still should
have tested-by's. For 4/17 I need a sanity check from James Bottomley
that I'm not forgetting some tidbit of TPM space implementation (has
been while since I've worked on it so better to have 2nd eyes there).
I think also 5/17, 7/17 and 10/17 could be merged.
I can reposition forementioned patches so that they are in the head of
the series.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
