[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181113024321.GE7453@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:43:21 +0800
From: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<bp@...en8.de>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<hpa@...or.com>, <keescook@...omium.org>, <bhe@...hat.com>,
<indou.takao@...fujitsu.com>, <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] x86/boot: Dig out SRAT table from RSDP and find
immovable memory
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 03:52:54PM -0500, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
[...]
>
>> +
>> + ret = cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg));
>> + if (ret == 4 && !strncmp(arg, "rsdt", 4))
>> + acpi_use_rsdt = true;
>
>All have to do for ret is checking whether it's above 0, right?
>So how about the following?
>
> if ((cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg)) > 0) &&
> !strncmp(arg, "rsdt", 4))
> acpi_use_rsdt = true;
Maybe:
> if ((cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg)) == 4) &&
> !strncmp(arg, "rsdt", 4))
> acpi_use_rsdt = true;
looks better. Thanks for your suggestion.
>
>> +
>> + /* Get RSDT or XSDT from RSDP. */
>> + if (!acpi_use_rsdt &&
>> + rsdp->xsdt_physical_address && rsdp->revision > 1) {
>> + root_table = rsdp->xsdt_physical_address;
>> + size = ACPI_XSDT_ENTRY_SIZE;
>> + } else {
>> + root_table = rsdp->rsdt_physical_address;
>> + size = ACPI_RSDT_ENTRY_SIZE;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Get ACPI root table from RSDT or XSDT.*/
>> + header = (struct acpi_table_header *)root_table;
>> + len = header->length;
>> + count = (u32)((len - sizeof(struct acpi_table_header)) / size);
>> + entry = ACPI_ADD_PTR(u8, header, sizeof(struct acpi_table_header));
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>> + u64 address64;
>> +
>> + if (size == ACPI_RSDT_ENTRY_SIZE)
>> + acpi_table = ((acpi_physical_address)
>> + (*ACPI_CAST_PTR(u32, entry)));
>> + else {
>> + *(u64 *)(void *)&address64 = *(u64 *)(void *)entry;
>> + acpi_table = (acpi_physical_address) address64;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (acpi_table) {
>> + header = (struct acpi_table_header *)acpi_table;
>
>> + signature = header->signature;
>
>this isn't needed.
Yes, will change it.
>
>> +
>> + if (ACPI_COMPARE_NAME(header->signature, ACPI_SIG_SRAT))
>> + return header;
>> + }
>> + entry += size;
>> + }
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * According to ACPI table, filter the immvoable memory regions
>> + * and store them in immovable_mem[].
>> + */
>> +void get_immovable_mem(void)
>> +{
>> + struct acpi_table_header *table_header;
>> + struct acpi_subtable_header *table;
>> + struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma;
>> + unsigned long table_end;
>> + char arg[10];
>> + int i = 0;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>
>> + ret = cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg));
>> + if (ret == 3 && !strncmp(arg, "off", 3))
>> + return;
>
>Same as above.
>
> if ((cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg)) > 0) &&
> !strncmp(arg, "off", 3))
> return;
>> +
>> + if (!cmdline_find_option_bool("movable_node"))
>> + return;
>
>I think this check isn't needed.
>The SRAT parsing is needed to the kaslr issue which I'm trying
>to fix. The issue may happen even if movable_node isn't set.
Got it.
>
>> +
>> + table_header = get_acpi_srat_table();
>> + if (!table_header)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + table_end = (unsigned long)table_header + table_header->length;
>> +
>> + table = (struct acpi_subtable_header *)
>> + ((unsigned long)table_header + sizeof(struct acpi_table_srat));
>> +
>> + while (((unsigned long)table) +
>> + sizeof(struct acpi_subtable_header) < table_end) {
>> + if (table->type == ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_MEMORY_AFFINITY) {
>> + ma = (struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *)table;
>> + if (!(ma->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE)) {
>> + immovable_mem[i].start = ma->base_address;
>> + immovable_mem[i].size = ma->length;
>> + i++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (i >= MAX_NUMNODES*2) {
>> + debug_putstr("Too many immovable memory regions, aborted.\n");
>
>I'm not sure this statement gets true actually,
>but if so, should it be set 0 to fallback in process_mem_region()?
That's a good problem.
Well, I don't know what will cause "i >= MAX_NUMNODES*2", maybe some
error in SRAT table or failed to parse table.
Anyway, it's a good idea to set it 0.
Thanks,
Chao Fan
>
>Thanks,
>Masa
>
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + table = (struct acpi_subtable_header *)
>> + ((unsigned long)table + table->length);
>> + }
>> + num_immovable_mem = i;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
>> index 9ed9709d9947..b251572e77af 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
>> @@ -87,10 +87,6 @@ static unsigned long get_boot_seed(void)
>> #define KASLR_COMPRESSED_BOOT
>> #include "../../lib/kaslr.c"
>>
>> -struct mem_vector {
>> - unsigned long long start;
>> - unsigned long long size;
>> -};
>>
>> /* Only supporting at most 4 unusable memmap regions with kaslr */
>> #define MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS 4
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
>> index a1d5918765f3..4a3645fda0ed 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
>> @@ -77,6 +77,11 @@ void choose_random_location(unsigned long input,
>> unsigned long *output,
>> unsigned long output_size,
>> unsigned long *virt_addr);
>> +struct mem_vector {
>> + unsigned long long start;
>> + unsigned long long size;
>> +};
>> +
>> /* cpuflags.c */
>> bool has_cpuflag(int flag);
>> #else
>> @@ -116,3 +121,13 @@ static inline void console_init(void)
>> void set_sev_encryption_mask(void);
>>
>> #endif
>> +
>> +/* acpitb.c */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE
>> +int num_immovable_mem;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
>> +/* Store the amount of immovable memory regions */
>> +#define ACPI_MAX_TABLES 128
>> +void get_immovable_mem(void);
>> +#endif
>> +#endif
>> --
>> 2.19.1
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists