linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/msm/dsi: Get PHY ref clock from the DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Nov 2018 15:30:36 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        Rajesh Yadav <ryadav@...eaurora.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/msm/dsi: Get PHY ref clock from the DT

Quoting Matthias Kaehlcke (2018-11-14 14:24:43)
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:11:48PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Matthias Kaehlcke (2018-11-02 14:45:34)
> > > @@ -630,7 +632,8 @@ static int pll_10nm_register(struct dsi_pll_10nm *pll_10nm)
> > >         char clk_name[32], parent[32], vco_name[32];
> > >         char parent2[32], parent3[32], parent4[32];
> > >         struct clk_init_data vco_init = {
> > > -               .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "xo" },
> > > +               .parent_names = (const char *[]){
> > > +                       __clk_get_name(pll_10nm->vco_ref_clk) },
> > 
> > I find this syntax odd, in addition to needing to check for NULL here as
> > Sean pointed out. Preferably just have it be the address of the
> > character pointer instead of making an anonymous array and then casting
> > that inline, i.e
> > 
> >               .parent_names = &ref_clk_name,
> 
> Ok
> 
> I'm not convinced the check for NULL is needed though, see my reply to Sean.

Ok! I'm fine either way on the NULL stuff.