[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ff5de62-d1df-9a67-1c86-497ce00a4de4@deltatee.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:29:38 -0700
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Fix distcc compilation with x86 macros
On 13/11/18 11:34 AM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> Just one question before I send v2, since I have second thoughts. Does it
> make sense to require the “DISTCC” make parameter, or should it be set in
> the Kconfig? It can be detected automatically, the same way gcc/clang are
> detected or manually through a config option.
I very much prefer the make variable as it can be set in the environment
without having to change the Kconfig.
Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists