[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181114171951.4137-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:19:51 +0100
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: a.zummo@...ertech.it, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com
Cc: linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: [PATCH v2] rtc: max8997: Fix the returned value in case of error in 'max8997_rtc_read_alarm()'
In case of error, we return 0.
This is spurious and not consistent with the other functions of the driver.
Propagate the error code instead.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
---
v2: re-word changelog and remove Fixes tag.
(not sure if any should be provided, and which one would be the best)
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-max8997.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max8997.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max8997.c
index 08c661a332ec..20e50d9fdf88 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max8997.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max8997.c
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static int max8997_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
out:
mutex_unlock(&info->lock);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
static int max8997_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max8997_rtc_info *info)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists