linux-kernel - Re: KVM selftests are failing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Nov 2018 21:23:41 +0200
From:   Ahmed Soliman <ahmedsoliman@...a.vt.edu>
To:     Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KVM selftests are failing

Hello,

> > I couldn't reproduce this on a Westmere. Are you sure you're testing
> > a clean compilation? Can you bisect the kernel?
I don't do a make clean normally, but I will do it this time when
bisecting, also I only use shallow
 clones so it will also take some time pulling. Also to note, The arch
I am using is Haswell, I am not
sure if that should make any difference though.
> What would be the difference in CONFIG_* fragments that you both have enabled?

Here is my config file:
https://pastebin.com/fCNV2z8c

Thanks,
-- 
Ahmed,
Junior Researcher, IoT and Cyber Security lab, SmartCI, Alexandria
University, & CIS @  VMI