[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5BECC905.4060802@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:16:53 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
rogerq@...com, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] extcon: Return -EPROBE_DEFER when extcon device
is not found
On 2018년 11월 14일 23:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 1:17 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 1:05 PM Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Changing NULL to -ENODEV is a trading bad to worse.
>
>> P.S. I still disagree with your arguments in relation to de facto use of an API.
>
> I spoke to colleagues of mine and they are agree that semantically
> -EPROBE_DEFER is a wrong error code from API that matches against some
> list.
> On the other hand, they agree with me that changing NULL to -ENODEV is
> a trading bad to worse.
>
> So, I withdraw mine complaints against API.
>
OK. Thanks.
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists