[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5ae825a-90ed-b7e2-ee71-e18c87c83d1a@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:53:40 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
aarcange@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Memory hotplug softlock issue
On 15.11.18 10:52, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 11/15/18 at 10:42am, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> I am wondering why it is always the last memory block of that device
>> (and even that node). Coincidence?
>
> I remember one or two times it's the last 6G or 4G which stall there,
> the size of memory block is 2G. But most of time it's the last memory
> block. And from the debug printing added by Michal's patch, it's the
> stress program itself which owns the migrating page and loop forvever
> there.
>
Alright, seems like you found a very good reproducer for an existing
problem :)
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists