[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537ce9d6-b311-3909-f625-2175eb5cf456@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 13:18:56 +0300
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@...hat.com>,
David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>, cluster-devel@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] dlm: memory leaks on error path in dlm_user_request()
According to comment in dlm_user_request() ua should be freed
in dlm_free_lkb() after successful attach to lkb.
However ua is attached to lkb not in set_lock_args() but later,
inside request_lock().
Fixes 597d0cae0f99 ("[DLM] dlm: user locks")
Cc: stable@...nel.org # 2.6.19
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
---
fs/dlm/lock.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index 03d767b94f7b..a928ba008d7d 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -5795,20 +5795,20 @@ int dlm_user_request(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_user_args *ua,
goto out;
}
}
-
- /* After ua is attached to lkb it will be freed by dlm_free_lkb().
- When DLM_IFL_USER is set, the dlm knows that this is a userspace
- lock and that lkb_astparam is the dlm_user_args structure. */
-
error = set_lock_args(mode, &ua->lksb, flags, namelen, timeout_cs,
fake_astfn, ua, fake_bastfn, &args);
- lkb->lkb_flags |= DLM_IFL_USER;
-
if (error) {
+ kfree(ua->lksb.sb_lvbptr);
+ ua->lksb.sb_lvbptr = NULL;
+ kfree(ua);
__put_lkb(ls, lkb);
goto out;
}
+ /* After ua is attached to lkb it will be freed by dlm_free_lkb().
+ When DLM_IFL_USER is set, the dlm knows that this is a userspace
+ lock and that lkb_astparam is the dlm_user_args structure. */
+ lkb->lkb_flags |= DLM_IFL_USER;
error = request_lock(ls, lkb, name, namelen, &args);
switch (error) {
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists