linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Fix distcc compilation with x86 macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9c1f58b9-6750-bd90-28b6-b00296525c6e@deltatee.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:00:03 -0700
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Fix distcc compilation with x86 macros



On 14/11/18 06:57 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> As long as the argument was *required* to get distcc to work at all, you
> could expect people would figure out an argument is needed. In this case, I
> suspect nobody will ever know about this argument (except you).

I agree with this completely.

> Eventually, if you get a fix into icecc, we will need to change the
> Makefile, consider the version number and act accordingly.

Yeah, that's probably a sensible way forward.

> Anyhow, I’ll add an argument as you asked, and let Ingo (& others) be the

An argument to force it to a regular compile would at least help with
experimenting with this stuff.

Logan