[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9c1f58b9-6750-bd90-28b6-b00296525c6e@deltatee.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:00:03 -0700
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Fix distcc compilation with x86 macros
On 14/11/18 06:57 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> As long as the argument was *required* to get distcc to work at all, you
> could expect people would figure out an argument is needed. In this case, I
> suspect nobody will ever know about this argument (except you).
I agree with this completely.
> Eventually, if you get a fix into icecc, we will need to change the
> Makefile, consider the version number and act accordingly.
Yeah, that's probably a sensible way forward.
> Anyhow, I’ll add an argument as you asked, and let Ingo (& others) be the
An argument to force it to a regular compile would at least help with
experimenting with this stuff.
Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists