linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: allwinner: Olimex A64-OLinuXino: enable eMMC.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Nov 2018 12:46:06 -0200
From:   Rodrigo Exterckötter Tjäder 
        <rodrigo@...der.xyz>
To:     maxime.ripard@...tlin.com
Cc:     wens@...e.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: allwinner: Olimex A64-OLinuXino: enable eMMC.

On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 12:48 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > What about the idea of keeping the current dt for the most featureful
> > variant and creating new dts for the other two?
> >
> > That would make it so that no one's device stops working and would
> > have mailine support for all three devices.
>
> IIRC that has been the first introduced version, so that would make
> sense. Chen-Yu, any opinion?
>
> > Also, the current device tree doesn't represent any existing device:
> > it has wifi on but no emmc. That variation does not exist.
>
> Most of our device tree are far from complete, so you shouldn't treat
> them as such.

So, any agreement on what is to be done about the devices tree for the
A64-OLinuXino devices?

In my opinion the best path would be keeping the current dt for the
most featureful variant and creating new dts for the other two.