linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] firmware: raspberrypi: Fix firmware calls with large buffers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:41:31 -0800
From:   Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Cc:     James Hughes <jnahughes@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: raspberrypi: Fix firmware calls with large buffers

Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:

> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com> wrote:
>> Hi James,
>>
>> please look at
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.19/process/submitting-patches.html,
>> because there are several issues with this patch. Most critical one is
>> that i received it not as plain text. Please make sure that send your
>> patch with git send-email.
>
> The irony is I had to fight Gmail over your multipart HTML+plain
> email. Yay email clients! ;)
>
>> Am 15.11.18 um 14:18 schrieb James Hughes:
>> > A previous change (5bfdc1097654) moved away from VLA's
>>
>> Please use the commit format mentioned in the link above.
>
> And actually, this SHA isn't the upstream SHA. This should be:
>
> a1547e0bca51 ("firmware: raspberrypi: Remove VLA usage")
>
>> > to a fixed maximum size for mailbox data.
>> > However, some mailbox calls use larger data buffers
>> > than the maximum allowed in that change. This fix therefor
>
> Which ones did this? In the initial change I couldn't find anything
> that exceeded 32 bytes. (I'm just curious if I missed something or if
> something new appeared.)

Nothing in tree used larger, it's that there are firmware transactions
that are bigger.

>> > [...]
>> > + /* Some mailboxes can use over 1k bytes. Rather than checking
>
> Up to Eric, but I think the preferred comment style is:
>
> /*
>  * lines go here
>  */
>
> Otherwise, this seems fine to me. Thanks for getting it fixed!

I have no preference about comment style, I just want fixes to land. :)

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)