[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181115143103.c6fa8fec343bb706b91f6c6c@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:31:03 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@...tuozzo.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: cleancache: fix corruption on missed inode
invalidation
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 12:57:34 +0300 Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
> If all pages are deleted from the mapping by memory reclaim and also
> moved to the cleancache:
>
> __delete_from_page_cache
> (no shadow case)
> unaccount_page_cache_page
> cleancache_put_page
> page_cache_delete
> mapping->nrpages -= nr
> (nrpages becomes 0)
>
> We don't clean the cleancache for an inode after final file truncation
> (removal).
>
> truncate_inode_pages_final
> check (nrpages || nrexceptional) is false
> no truncate_inode_pages
> no cleancache_invalidate_inode(mapping)
>
> These way when reading the new file created with same inode we may get
> these trash leftover pages from cleancache and see wrong data instead of
> the contents of the new file.
>
> Fix it by always doing truncate_inode_pages which is already ready for
> nrpages == 0 && nrexceptional == 0 case and just invalidates inode.
>
Data corruption sounds serious. Shouldn't we backport this into
-stable kernels?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists