[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.21.1811151535310.19@nippy.intranet>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 15:37:02 +1100 (AEDT)
From: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>
cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Stephen N Chivers <schivers@....com.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Philip Blundell <philb@....org>,
Joshua Thompson <funaho@...ai.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/13] m68k: Drop ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi Finn,
>
> On 14/11/18 3:58 PM, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Hi Finn,
> >
> > Am 14.11.2018 um 14:08 schrieb Michael Schmitz:
> > > > Can you also test tree fbf8405cd982 please?
> > > >
> > > My tests were on c606b5cf902 in case it wasn't clear. I've now seen
> > > fbf8405cd982, one moment please ...
> > >
> > > That one does appear to work - different versions of ARAnyM, and
> > > different userland versions though. I'll test that again with the setup
> > > that saw c606b5cf902 fail.
> >
> > Still fails on that emulator / userland.
> >
> Must be a quirk of ARAnyM 1.0.2 (or powerpc). With 0.9.15 on x86_64, it's
> fine.
>
Could be a regression in aranym?
Maybe it's worth trying 0.9.15 on the powerpc host?
> I'm sufficiently convinced to try this on actual hardware now.
>
Thanks!
--
> Cheers,
>
> ??? Michael
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists