[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181116000154.GS2089@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:01:54 -0800
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression in next with spi return from transfer_one()
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 03:44:00PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> It seems to be caused because of the now missing "if (ret > 0) {"
> line somehow that was there earlier. New code sets ms to 200 it
> seems, then dmesg shows:
Doh, of course :( Sorry I missed that.
> The old code is not updating ms and it's set to 1.
Right, and not waiting either which should be the issue. Does the
following work:
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index 498d3b9bf3ae..430ad637c643 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -1114,9 +1114,11 @@ static int spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_controller *ctlr,
goto out;
}
- ret = spi_transfer_wait(ctlr, msg, xfer);
- if (ret < 0)
- msg->status = ret;
+ if (ret > 0) {
+ ret = spi_transfer_wait(ctlr, msg, xfer);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ msg->status = ret;
+ }
} else {
if (xfer->len)
dev_err(&msg->spi->dev,
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists