[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALxhOngbgaqmcNPJ3xiBLrk35UWQ4ThJ-rApbd1z+9772yGpyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:18:35 +0530
From: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] xtensa: add __NR_syscalls along with __NR_syscall_count
Hi Max,
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 01:15, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:05 AM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 05:19, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com> wrote:
> > > If we remove __NR_syscall_count from the uapi header I'd
> > > suggest dropping it completely and switching its two current
> > > users to __NR_syscalls.
> >
> > I'm not removing the __NR_syscall_count macro; just place it
> > in asm/unistd.h file for the above reason.
>
> Ok, I'll apply this series to the xtensa tree and make my cleanups
> on top of it.
>
> > FYI, I made sure that the kernel will build with my patch. I would
> > appreciate if you can perform the boot test on the actual platform.
>
> I did a simple boot testing on a range of configurations, it works.
> I'll also run LTP a bit later.
Great, thanks!
Firoz
>
> --
> Thanks.
> -- Max
Powered by blists - more mailing lists