linux-kernel - Re: [RCF PATCH,v2,2/2] pwm: imx: Configure output to GPIO in disabled state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181116082557.l2ljgu3hsu7tvdci@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 16 Nov 2018 09:25:57 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Vokáč Michal <Michal.Vokac@...ft.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RCF PATCH,v2,2/2] pwm: imx: Configure output to GPIO in
 disabled state

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 08:34:30AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > Hello Thierry,
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:25:45PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:51:20PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:  
> > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:34:49PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:  
> [...]
> > > > Also dts writes don't need to lookup the needed GPIO numbers and pinctrl.  
> > > 
> > > Just to clarify: I don't think that we need to get the GPIO number
> > > involved in this case, because we don't have to reconfigure the pin as
> > > GPIO to make this work. The only reason that Michal's proposal did that
> > > is because that was believed to be necessary. But if the pin can just be
> > > configured with a 100k pull-up, that's enough to pull the pin high when
> > > we need it.  
> > 
> > Unless the gpio happens to be configured as output at the wrong value.
> > Further I'm not sure if the pwm in disabled state actively pulls to 0
> > and if in this state the PU of the pin is good enough to ensure a one
> > here. That would need verification first.
>
> No. You can disable the output driver via pinctrl, so that only the
> selected pull-up/down is relevant. The pin function and GPIO register
> settings don't matter at all in this case.

Is this about DSE=HI-Z in the pad control register? I didn't know about
this. I see this exists on i.MX6 but not on i.MX25. Also i.MX51 doesn't
seem to have this feature.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |