[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1542365221.3020.9.camel@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:47:01 +0100
From: osalvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm, memory_hotplug: be more verbose for memory
offline failures
On Fri, 2018-11-16 at 09:30 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index a919ba5cb3c8..ec2c7916dc2d 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -7845,6 +7845,7 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone,
> struct page *page, int count,
> return false;
> unmovable:
> WARN_ON_ONCE(zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE);
> + dump_page(pfn_to_page(pfn+iter), "unmovable page");
Would not be enough to just do:
dump_page(page, "unmovable page".
Unless I am missing something, page should already have the
right pfn?
<---
unsigned long check = pfn + iter;
page = pfn_to_page(check);
--->
The rest looks good to me
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists