linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/fpu: track AVX-512 usage of tasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Nov 2018 17:04:35 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
        Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com
Cc:     ak@...ux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
        arjan@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/fpu: track AVX-512 usage of tasks

On 11/15/18 4:21 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2018/11/15 23:40, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 11/14/18 3:00 PM, Aubrey Li wrote:
>>> AVX-512 component has 3 states, only Hi16_ZMM state causes notable
>>> frequency drop. Add per task Hi16_ZMM state tracking to context switch.
>>
>> Just curious, but is there any public documentation of this?  It seems
>> really odd to me that something using the same AVX-512 instructions on
>> some low-numbered registers would behave differently than the same
>> instructions on some high-numbered registers.  I'm not saying this is
>> wrong, but it's certainly counter-intuitive and I think that begs for
>> some more explanation.
> 
> Yes, Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures software developer's Manual mentioned
> this in performance event CORE_POWER.LVL2_TURBO_LICENSE.
> 
> "Core cycles where the core was running with power delivery for license
> level 2 (introduced in Skylake Server microarchitecture). This includes
> high current AVX 512-bit instructions."
> 
> I translated license level 2 to frequency drop.

OK, but that talks about AVX 512 and not specifically about Hi16_ZMM's
impact which is what this patch measures.  Are the Hi16_ZMM intricacies
documented anywhere?