[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181116134541.GH3165@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 14:45:41 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, Boaz Harrosh <ooo@...ctrozaur.com>,
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>, cluster-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 09/19] block: introduce bio_bvecs()
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:52:56PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> There are still cases in which we need to use bio_bvecs() for get the
> number of multi-page segment, so introduce it.
The only user in your final tree seems to be the loop driver, and
even that one only uses the helper for read/write bios.
I think something like this would be much simpler in the end:
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index d509902a8046..712511815ac6 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -514,16 +514,18 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
struct request *rq = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd);
struct bio *bio = rq->bio;
struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
+ struct bvec_iter bvec_iter;
+ struct bio_vec tmp;
unsigned int offset;
int nr_bvec = 0;
int ret;
+ __rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq)
+ bio_for_each_bvec(tmp, bio, bvec_iter)
+ nr_bvec++;
+
if (rq->bio != rq->biotail) {
- struct bvec_iter iter;
- struct bio_vec tmp;
- __rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq)
- nr_bvec += bio_bvecs(bio);
bvec = kmalloc_array(nr_bvec, sizeof(struct bio_vec),
GFP_NOIO);
if (!bvec)
@@ -537,7 +539,7 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
* API will take care of all details for us.
*/
__rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq)
- bio_for_each_bvec(tmp, bio, iter) {
+ bio_for_each_bvec(tmp, bio, bvec_iter) {
*bvec = tmp;
bvec++;
}
@@ -551,7 +553,6 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
*/
offset = bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done;
bvec = __bvec_iter_bvec(bio->bi_io_vec, bio->bi_iter);
- nr_bvec = bio_bvecs(bio);
}
atomic_set(&cmd->ref, 2);
diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
index dcad0b69f57a..379440d1ced0 100644
--- a/include/linux/bio.h
+++ b/include/linux/bio.h
@@ -200,30 +200,6 @@ static inline unsigned bio_segments(struct bio *bio)
}
}
-static inline unsigned bio_bvecs(struct bio *bio)
-{
- unsigned bvecs = 0;
- struct bio_vec bv;
- struct bvec_iter iter;
-
- /*
- * We special case discard/write same/write zeroes, because they
- * interpret bi_size differently:
- */
- switch (bio_op(bio)) {
- case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
- case REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE:
- case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
- return 0;
- case REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME:
- return 1;
- default:
- bio_for_each_bvec(bv, bio, iter)
- bvecs++;
- return bvecs;
- }
-}
-
/*
* get a reference to a bio, so it won't disappear. the intended use is
* something like:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists