[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181116161122.hhvslbzdujxpk3up@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:11:22 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] clk: Add of_clk_get_by_name_optional() function
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:01:28PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Other than that I think the patch is fine
Thinking again, I wonder why not just do:
static inline struct clk *clk_get_optional(struct device *dev, const char *id)
{
struct clk *c = clk_get(dev, id);
if (c == ERR_PTR(-ENOENT))
return NULL;
else
return c;
}
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists