linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/15] ARM/arm64: sunxi: Move H3/H5 syscon label over to soc-specific nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181116163935.b4wsf3sfi4arwrtz@flea>
Date:   Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:39:35 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] ARM/arm64: sunxi: Move H3/H5 syscon label over to
 soc-specific nodes

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:47:50PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 5:39 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 03:50:06PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > Now that we have specific nodes for the H3 and H5 system-controller
> > > that allow proper access to the EMAC clock configuration register,
> > > we no longer need a common dummy syscon node.
> > >
> > > Switch the syscon label over to each platform's dtsi file.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi              | 2 +-
> > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi           | 6 ------
> > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi | 2 +-
> > >  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
> > > index 7157d954fb8c..b337a9282783 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
> > > @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@
> > >       };
> > >
> > >       soc {
> > > -             system-control@...0000 {
> > > +             syscon: system-control@...0000 {
> > >                       compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-system-control";
> > >                       reg = <0x01c00000 0x1000>;
> > >                       #address-cells = <1>;
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi
> > > index 4b1530ebe427..9175ff0fb59a 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi
> > > @@ -152,12 +152,6 @@
> > >                       };
> > >               };
> > >
> > > -             syscon: syscon@...0000 {
> > > -                     compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-system-controller",
> > > -                             "syscon";
> > > -                     reg = <0x01c00000 0x1000>;
> > > -             };
> > > -
> >
> > You're also dropping the syscon compatible there. But I'm not sure how
> > it could work with the H3 EMAC driver that would overwrite the
> > compatible already.
> 
> I assume you are referring to the previous patch? The node names are not
> the same, hence the previous patch is adding another node for the system
> controller, and this patch removes the old one with the "syscon" compatible.
> 
> We already patched the EMAC driver to support the new SRAM controller based
> regmap, so other than making people unhappy about having to update their
> DT, I don't think there would be any problems. This also means H3 in -next
> currently has _two_ syscon nodes.

Ah, indeed, I missed that. Pointing that out in the commit log could
be nice though.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com