linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] ACPI HMAT memory sysfs representation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Nov 2018 08:55:20 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ACPI HMAT memory sysfs representation

On 11/15/18 10:27 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Not able to see the patches from this series either on the list or on the
> archive (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/15/331). IIRC last time we discussed
> about this and the concern which I raised was in absence of a broader NUMA
> rework for multi attribute memory it might not a good idea to settle down
> and freeze sysfs interface for the user space. 

This *is* the broader NUMA rework.  I think it's just a bit more
incremental that what you originally had in mind.

Did you have an alternative for how you wanted this to look?