[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15703.1542393111@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:31:51 -0500
From: valdis.kletnieks@...edu
To: Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@...il.com>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org,
Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@...il.com>,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
Takahiro Akashi <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
mark.rutland@....com, Sungjinn Chung <barami97@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ARM64] Printing IRQ stack usage information
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 23:13:48 +0530, Pintu Agarwal said:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:16 PM <valdis.kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> > Congrats. You just re-invented DEBUG_STACK_USAGE, which just keeps a high-water mark
> > for stack usage.
>
> So, you mean to say, my implementation is good enough to get the
> irq_stack usage, from the interrupt handler ?
No - your code doesn't keep a high-water mark (which should probably be
hooked into the IRQ exit code.
> But my concern is that if I dump it from irq handler, I will get
> information only for the current cpu.
> How do I store and get the information for all the cpu from the boot time ?
Make the high-water mark a per-cpu variable.
> From where do I call my dump_irq_stack_info() [some where during the
> entry/exit part of the irq handler], so that I could dump information
> for all the handler at boot time itself ?
No, you don't do a dump-stack during entry/exit. You just maintain a high-water
value in the exit, and then you create a /proc/something or similar that when
read does a 'foreach CPU do print_high_water_irq'.
> Like I would to capture these information:
> - What was the name of the handler ?
> - Which cpu was executing it ?
> - How much irq stack (max value, same like high water mark) were used
> at that time ?
First, do the easy part and find out if you even *care* once you see actual
numbers. If your IRQ stack is 8K but you never use more than 2500 bytes,
do you *really* care about the name of the handler anymore?
Also, see the code for /proc/interrupts to see how it keeps track of the
interrupts per CPU - maybe all you need to do is change each entry from
a 'count' to 'count, highwater'.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists