[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1811171044510.21108@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 10:47:22 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman9394@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v5 11/16] x86/speculation: Add Spectre v2 app to app
protection modes
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, Tim Chen wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 81d1d5a..9c306e3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -4215,6 +4215,26 @@
> Not specifying this option is equivalent to
> spectre_v2=auto.
>
> + spectre_v2_app2app=
> + [X86] Control mitigation of Spectre variant 2
> + application to application (indirect branch speculation)
> + vulnerability.
> +
> + off - Unconditionally disable mitigations
> + lite - Protect tasks which have requested restricted
> + indirect branch speculation via the
> + PR_SET_SPECULATION_CTRL prctl().
Don't we also want to do the same for SECCOMP processess, analogically how
we do it for SSBD?
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists