[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbakPGfHap+WcuJ_TVn861zqQDxW-on4q9Wx+-QQb0ESw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:18:23 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>, heiko.stuebner@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: rockchip: allow specifying the regmap
location for pin-routes
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 10:01 PM Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...com>
>
> Right now we expect the pin-rounting settings to be in the same area
> as the iomux setting itself. And while that seems to be true for all
> newer Rockchip socs, back in the wild west days of old this wasn't true.
>
> Nowadays pin settings in the GRF normally stay in the GRF and the same
> is true for pins configured from PMU registers. But old socs like the
> rk3188 really sprinkle pin settings somewhat randomly through both
> for its bank0.
>
> Therefore add the option to specify a location for the route setting,
> so that we can map older socs correctly. We'll keep "same" as the
> default, so that we only need to specify a location in the corner-cases
> described above.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...com>
Patch applied with David's review tag.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists