[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181117210840.GE22813@amd>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 22:08:40 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
"H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] drm/omap: add framedone interrupt support
Hi!
> This prepares framedone interrupt handling for
> manual display update support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> @@ -217,6 +239,9 @@ static irqreturn_t omap_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
>
> if (irqstatus & priv->dispc_ops->mgr_get_sync_lost_irq(priv->dispc, channel))
> omap_crtc_error_irq(crtc, irqstatus);
> +
> + if (irqstatus & priv->dispc_ops->mgr_get_framedone_irq(priv->dispc, channel))
> + omap_crtc_framedone_irq(crtc, irqstatus);
> }
>
> omap_irq_ocp_error_handler(dev, irqstatus);
Will the mgr_get_framedone_irq(priv->dispc, channel) change from
interrupt to interrupt? Would it make sense to cache result as a
micro-organization?
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists