[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181118082023.GJ5897@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 10:20:23 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, dave.hansen@...el.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, nhorman@...hat.com,
npmccallum@...hat.com, serge.ayoun@...el.com,
shay.katz-zamir@...el.com, haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
kai.svahn@...el.com, mark.shanahan@...el.com, luto@...capital.net,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 01/23] x86/sgx: Update MAINTAINERS
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:24:03PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:07:14PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Yes, I think it could be renamed as sgx.c. Should the driver part be
> > also called as sgx.ko?
>
> I guess that's your call guys. The reason why I asked is because I like
> shorter names and "sgx" is unambiguous enough. AFAICT, there's no one
> else doing SGX atm.
>
> :-)
We go with that! Thanks for the feedback.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists