[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181118.223355.244349385967273824.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 22:33:55 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: namhyung@...nel.org
Cc: jolsa@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jolsa@...nel.org, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] hist lookups
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:28:37 +0900
> Hello David,
>
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 08:52:43PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
>> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:40:54 +0100
>>
>> > I pushed/rebased what I have to perf/fixes branch again
>> >
>> > please note I had to change our compile changes, because
>> > they wouldn't compile on x86, but I can't verify on sparc,
>> > so you might see some compile fails again
>>
>> I just checked your current perf/fixes branch.
>>
>> It builds on Sparc ;-)
>>
>> And it behaves better too. I do get tons of drops and lost events,
>> but it seems to keep going even during the hardest load.
>>
>> Eventually I end up with a lot of unresolvable histogram entries,
>> so that is something to look into.
>
> Did you record callchains as well? I'd like to know whether it's
> related to the children (cumulative) mode or not.
I did not have callchains on, just plain "./perf top"
Powered by blists - more mailing lists