[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181119162626.236220048@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:29:39 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 73/83] fuse: fix leaked notify reply
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
commit 7fabaf303458fcabb694999d6fa772cc13d4e217 upstream.
fuse_request_send_notify_reply() may fail if the connection was reset for
some reason (e.g. fs was unmounted). Don't leak request reference in this
case. Besides leaking memory, this resulted in fc->num_waiting not being
decremented and hence fuse_wait_aborted() left in a hanging and unkillable
state.
Fixes: 2d45ba381a74 ("fuse: add retrieve request")
Fixes: b8f95e5d13f5 ("fuse: umount should wait for all requests")
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+6339eda9cb4ebbc4c37b@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> #v2.6.36
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -1715,8 +1715,10 @@ static int fuse_retrieve(struct fuse_con
req->in.args[1].size = total_len;
err = fuse_request_send_notify_reply(fc, req, outarg->notify_unique);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
fuse_retrieve_end(fc, req);
+ fuse_put_request(fc, req);
+ }
return err;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists