lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181119162636.417177997@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:28:09 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+7f4a27091759e2fe7453@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 050/160] jbd2: fix use after free in jbd2_log_do_checkpoint()

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit ccd3c4373eacb044eb3832966299d13d2631f66f upstream.

The code cleaning transaction's lists of checkpoint buffers has a bug
where it increases bh refcount only after releasing
journal->j_list_lock. Thus the following race is possible:

CPU0					CPU1
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint()
					jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers()
					  __journal_try_to_free_buffer(bh)
  ...
  while (transaction->t_checkpoint_io_list)
  ...
    if (buffer_locked(bh)) {

<-- IO completes now, buffer gets unlocked -->

      spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
					    spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
					    __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh);
					    spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
					  try_to_free_buffers(page);
      get_bh(bh) <-- accesses freed bh

Fix the problem by grabbing bh reference before unlocking
journal->j_list_lock.

Fixes: dc6e8d669cf5 ("jbd2: don't call get_bh() before calling __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint()")
Fixes: be1158cc615f ("jbd2: fold __process_buffer() into jbd2_log_do_checkpoint()")
Reported-by: syzbot+7f4a27091759e2fe7453@...kaller.appspotmail.com
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
@@ -254,8 +254,8 @@ restart:
 		bh = jh2bh(jh);
 
 		if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
-			spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 			get_bh(bh);
+			spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 			wait_on_buffer(bh);
 			/* the journal_head may have gone by now */
 			BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "brelse");
@@ -336,8 +336,8 @@ restart2:
 		jh = transaction->t_checkpoint_io_list;
 		bh = jh2bh(jh);
 		if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
-			spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 			get_bh(bh);
+			spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 			wait_on_buffer(bh);
 			/* the journal_head may have gone by now */
 			BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "brelse");


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ