linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 084/160] btrfs: Handle owner mismatch gracefully when walking up tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:28:43 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Xu Wen <wen.xu@...ech.edu>,
        Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 084/160] btrfs: Handle owner mismatch gracefully when walking up tree

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>

commit 65c6e82becec33731f48786e5a30f98662c86b16 upstream.

[BUG]
When mounting certain crafted image, btrfs will trigger kernel BUG_ON()
when trying to recover balance:

  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8956!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
  CPU: 1 PID: 662 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.18.0-rc1-custom+ #10
  RIP: 0010:walk_up_proc+0x336/0x480 [btrfs]
  RSP: 0018:ffffb53540c9b890 EFLAGS: 00010202
  Call Trace:
   walk_up_tree+0x172/0x1f0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x3a4/0x830 [btrfs]
   merge_reloc_roots+0xe1/0x1d0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_recover_relocation+0x3ea/0x420 [btrfs]
   open_ctree+0x1af3/0x1dd0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_mount_root+0x66b/0x740 [btrfs]
   mount_fs+0x3b/0x16a
   vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x140
   btrfs_mount+0x16d/0x890 [btrfs]
   mount_fs+0x3b/0x16a
   vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x140
   do_mount+0x1fd/0xda0
   ksys_mount+0xba/0xd0
   __x64_sys_mount+0x21/0x30
   do_syscall_64+0x60/0x210
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

[CAUSE]
Extent tree corruption.  In this particular case, reloc tree root's
owner is DATA_RELOC_TREE (should be TREE_RELOC), thus its backref is
corrupted and we failed the owner check in walk_up_tree().

[FIX]
It's pretty hard to take care of every extent tree corruption, but at
least we can remove such BUG_ON() and exit more gracefully.

And since in this particular image, DATA_RELOC_TREE and TREE_RELOC share
the same root (which is obviously invalid), we needs to make
__del_reloc_root() more robust to detect such invalid sharing to avoid
possible NULL dereference as root->node can be NULL in this case.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200411
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@...ech.edu>
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |   18 ++++++++++++------
 fs/btrfs/relocation.c  |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -8704,15 +8704,14 @@ static noinline int walk_up_proc(struct
 	if (eb == root->node) {
 		if (wc->flags[level] & BTRFS_BLOCK_FLAG_FULL_BACKREF)
 			parent = eb->start;
-		else
-			BUG_ON(root->root_key.objectid !=
-			       btrfs_header_owner(eb));
+		else if (root->root_key.objectid != btrfs_header_owner(eb))
+			goto owner_mismatch;
 	} else {
 		if (wc->flags[level + 1] & BTRFS_BLOCK_FLAG_FULL_BACKREF)
 			parent = path->nodes[level + 1]->start;
-		else
-			BUG_ON(root->root_key.objectid !=
-			       btrfs_header_owner(path->nodes[level + 1]));
+		else if (root->root_key.objectid !=
+			 btrfs_header_owner(path->nodes[level + 1]))
+			goto owner_mismatch;
 	}

 	btrfs_free_tree_block(trans, root, eb, parent, wc->refs[level] == 1);
@@ -8720,6 +8719,11 @@ out:
 	wc->refs[level] = 0;
 	wc->flags[level] = 0;
 	return 0;
+
+owner_mismatch:
+	btrfs_err_rl(root->fs_info, "unexpected tree owner, have %llu expect %llu",
+		     btrfs_header_owner(eb), root->root_key.objectid);
+	return -EUCLEAN;
 }

 static noinline int walk_down_tree(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
@@ -8773,6 +8777,8 @@ static noinline int walk_up_tree(struct
 			ret = walk_up_proc(trans, root, path, wc);
 			if (ret > 0)
 				return 0;
+			if (ret < 0)
+				return ret;

 			if (path->locks[level]) {
 				btrfs_tree_unlock_rw(path->nodes[level],
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -1318,7 +1318,7 @@ static void __del_reloc_root(struct btrf
 	struct mapping_node *node = NULL;
 	struct reloc_control *rc = root->fs_info->reloc_ctl;

-	if (rc) {
+	if (rc && root->node) {
 		spin_lock(&rc->reloc_root_tree.lock);
 		rb_node = tree_search(&rc->reloc_root_tree.rb_root,
 				      root->node->start);