linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] tpm: pass an array of tpm_bank_list structures to tpm_pcr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Nov 2018 09:22:32 +0100
From:   Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, <david.safford@...com>,
        <monty.wiseman@...com>, <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <silviu.vlasceanu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] tpm: pass an array of tpm_bank_list structures to
 tpm_pcr_extend()

On 11/18/2018 8:29 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 04:55:36PM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
>> I understood from a previous email that you want to include all API
>> changes for crypto agility in the same patch set.
> 
> Hmm.. maybe there is some misunderstading. Can you point me to the
> comment? Thanks.

---
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:24:46PM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
 > Should I include the patch for tpm_pcr_extend() in this patch set, even
 > if the set fixes the digest size issue?

Just add some note to the cover letter. Makes sense here to have a
prequel patch for that because otherwise the implementation will be
a bit messy and half-baked.
---

Roberto


> /Jarkko
> 

-- 
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Bo PENG, Jian LI, Yanli SHI