[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29ddffae-b61b-be92-c235-a79ecdf7512c@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:36:49 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
olof@...om.net, arnd@...db.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, zhao_steven@....net,
service@...micro.com,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/16] irqchip: Add RDA8810PL interrupt driver
Manivannan,
On 19/11/2018 17:09, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Add interrupt driver for RDA Micro RDA8810PL SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-rda/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 4 ++
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-rda-intc.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 122 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-rda-intc.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rda/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-rda/Kconfig
> index dafab78d7aab..29012bc68ca4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rda/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rda/Kconfig
> @@ -3,5 +3,6 @@ menuconfig ARCH_RDA
> depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
> select COMMON_CLK
> select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> + select RDA_INTC
> help
> This enables support for the RDA Micro 8810PL SoC family.
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 51a5ef0e96ed..9d54645870ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -195,6 +195,10 @@ config JCORE_AIC
> help
> Support for the J-Core integrated AIC.
>
> +config RDA_INTC
> + bool
> + select IRQ_DOMAIN
> +
> config RENESAS_INTC_IRQPIN
> bool
> select IRQ_DOMAIN
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index 794c13d3ac3d..417108027e40 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_IMGPDC_IRQ) += irq-imgpdc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_MIPS_CPU) += irq-mips-cpu.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SIRF_IRQ) += irq-sirfsoc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_JCORE_AIC) += irq-jcore-aic.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RDA_INTC) += irq-rda-intc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_INTC_IRQPIN) += irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_IRQC) += irq-renesas-irqc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VERSATILE_FPGA_IRQ) += irq-versatile-fpga.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-rda-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-rda-intc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..89be55a11823
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-rda-intc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * RDA8810PL SoC irqchip driver
> + *
> + * Copyright RDA Microelectronics Company Limited
> + * Copyright (c) 2017 Andreas Färber
> + * Copyright (c) 2018 Manivannan Sadhasivam
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/irq.h>
> +#include <asm/exception.h>
> +
> +#define RDA_INTC_FINALSTATUS 0x00
> +#define RDA_INTC_STATUS 0x04
> +#define RDA_INTC_MASK_SET 0x08
> +#define RDA_INTC_MASK_CLR 0x0c
> +#define RDA_INTC_WAKEUP_MASK 0x18
> +#define RDA_INTC_CPU_SLEEP 0x1c
> +
> +#define RDA_IRQ_MASK_ALL 0xFFFFFFFF
> +
> +#define RDA_NR_IRQS 32
> +
> +void __iomem *base;
Should be static?
> +
> +static void rda_intc_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + void __iomem *base = (void __iomem *)irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
Aliases with the above. Please choose whether you want a global or a
per-interrupt base.
> +
> + writel(BIT(d->hwirq), base + RDA_INTC_MASK_CLR);
writel_relaxed()
> +}
> +
> +static void rda_intc_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + void __iomem *base = (void __iomem *)irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +
> + writel(BIT(d->hwirq), base + RDA_INTC_MASK_SET);
Same here.
> +}
> +
> +static int rda_intc_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int flow_type)
> +{
> + if (flow_type & (IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING))
> + irq_set_handler(data->irq, handle_edge_irq);
> + if (flow_type & (IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW))
> + irq_set_handler(data->irq, handle_level_irq);
So you don't need to set anything in your interrupt controller for this
to switch between level and edge? That'd be a first...
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +struct irq_domain *rda_irq_domain;
static?
> +
> +static void __exception_irq_entry rda_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + u32 stat = readl(base + RDA_INTC_FINALSTATUS);
> + u32 hwirq;
> +
> + while (stat) {
> + hwirq = __fls(stat);
> + handle_domain_irq(rda_irq_domain, hwirq, regs);
> + stat &= ~(1 << hwirq);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip rda_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "rda-intc",
> + .irq_ack = rda_intc_mask_irq,
You're joking, right? What does it mean to implement both ack as mask
when you already have mask?
> + .irq_mask = rda_intc_mask_irq,
> + .irq_unmask = rda_intc_unmask_irq,
> + .irq_set_type = rda_intc_set_type,
> + .irq_disable = rda_intc_mask_irq,
What is this disable for? Implementing enable/disable only makes sense
if their different implementation differs from mask/unmask (and that
they add some real value, such as allocating resource).
> +};
> +
> +static int rda_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d,
> + unsigned int virq, irq_hw_number_t hw)
> +{
> + irq_set_status_flags(virq, IRQ_LEVEL);
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &rda_irq_chip, handle_level_irq);
The set_type callback is specially puzzling when you set everything to
be level...
> + irq_set_chip_data(virq, d->host_data);
> + irq_set_probe(virq);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops rda_irq_domain_ops = {
> + .map = rda_irq_map,
> + .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_onecell,
... and don't have any way to express an edge interrupt in DT.
> +};
> +
> +static int __init rda8810_intc_init(struct device_node *node,
> + struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> + base = of_io_request_and_map(node, 0, "rda-intc");
> + if (!base)
> + return -ENXIO;
> + /*
> + * Mask, and invalid all interrupt sources
> + */
> + writel(RDA_IRQ_MASK_ALL, base + RDA_INTC_MASK_CLR);
> +
> + rda_irq_domain = irq_domain_create_linear(&node->fwnode, RDA_NR_IRQS,
> + &rda_irq_domain_ops, base);
> + WARN_ON(!rda_irq_domain);
Just WARN_ON(), and carry on? Please implement some error handling.
> +
> + set_handle_irq(rda_handle_irq);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(rda_intc, "rda,8810pl-intc", rda8810_intc_init);
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists