[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92a4a24d-6619-876f-18df-1326914f5cc1@wdc.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 09:57:26 -0800
From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"anup@...infault.org" <anup@...infault.org>,
Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"sudeep.holla@....com" <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"palmer@...ive.com" <palmer@...ive.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"juri.lelli@....com" <juri.lelli@....com>,
"mick@....forth.gr" <mick@....forth.gr>,
"jeremy.linton@....com" <jeremy.linton@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common
binding.
On 11/17/18 8:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 05:50:07PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
>> cpu-map binding can be used to described cpu topology for both
>> RISC-V & ARM. It makes more sense to move the binding to document
>> to a common place.
>>
>> The relevant discussion can be found here.
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/6/19
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt | 475 -------------------
>> .../devicetree/bindings/cpu/cpu-topology.txt | 526 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 526 insertions(+), 475 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpu/cpu-topology.txt
>
> Please send this with '-M' option so we just get the real changes.
>
Sure. I will resend it.
Regards,
Atish
> Rob
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists