[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c16f6107-f58b-b747-1e8d-e7d3c302f0e5@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 10:29:36 -0800
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman9394@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v5 12/16] x86/speculation: Create PRCTL interface to
restrict indirect branch speculation
On 11/17/2018 01:53 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, Tim Chen wrote:
>
>
> I think that the fact that this talks about "indirect branch predictions"
> in general terms, but really controls only the SMT aspect of it (STIBP),
> as quite confusing.
>
> So I believe it should either be renamed, or actually control semantics of
> IBPB as well, no?
It does control STIBP. You have suggestion on an alternative name?
Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists