[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181119142756.057ad784@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:27:56 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Do not bug in __sched_setscheduler() when pi is
not used
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 11:09:50 -0800
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> > I did the change against v4.2.8 below.
>
> Thanks Steven! Here is the local 4.9 backport:
Yours even updates the comment.
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 917be221438b..6b3fff6a6437 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -4087,8 +4087,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
> int queue_flags = DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE;
> struct rq *rq;
>
> - /* may grab non-irq protected spin_locks */
> - BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
> + /* The pi code expects interrupts enabled */
> + BUG_ON(pi && in_interrupt());
> recheck:
> /* double check policy once rq lock held */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists