[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181119100825.277b1f97@bbrezillon>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 10:08:25 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"open list:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY..." <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] at24: remove
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 09:58:46 +0100
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> niedz., 18 lis 2018 o 17:03 Boris Brezillon
> <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com> napisaĆ(a):
> >
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:01:08 +0100
> > Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > > As far as merging of this series goes: I'd like to avoid dragging it over
> > > four releases. The series is logically split into five groups:
> > >
> > > patches 1-2: nvmem and mtd changes
> > > patches 3-9: davinci arch-specific changes
> > > patches 10-13: networking changes
> > > patches 14-24: davinci specific again
> > > patch 25: final at24 change
> > >
> > > With that I believe we can do the following: Greg KH could pick up the
> > > first two patches into his char-misc tree.
> >
> > The char-misc tree? Why not the MTD or NVMEM tree?
> >
>
> There is no NVMEM tree - Srinivas sends his patches to Greg to be
> applied to char-misc.
Okay, I didn't know that.
>
> The second patch depends on the first one so in order to avoid more
> merging problems I suggested that the MTD patch go through char-misc
> as well. If you see a better solution, please let me know.
No that's fine, as long as I have an immutable tag/branch I can pull if
needed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists