linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] clk: Add of_clk_get_by_name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:58:11 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] clk: Add of_clk_get_by_name_optional() function

Hello Phil,

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:53:46PM +0000, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> On 19 November 2018 10:46 Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:41:42AM +0000, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> > > btw, do we need to add of_clk_get_by_name_optional()? I only added it
> > > as a counterpart to of_clk_get_by_name(), but it may not be needed.
> > 
> > I don't need it. Given that it is easy to add when someone has a need, I'd say,
> > skip it for now.
> 
> I'm wondering if we actually need clk_get_optional(). For me at least, I just
> want devm_clk_get_optional(). That would get rid of the arch patches.

Given that clk_get_optional will be that simple, it can live in
linux/clk.h for all implementors of the clk API, then you don't have to
care about different archs. (Unless I'm missing something.)

I don't think it's a good idea to drop clk_get_optional even if you'd
have to provide arch-specific stuff.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |