[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181119151057.GC26852@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 16:10:57 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
Cc: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...tlin.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
f.fainelli@...il.com, allan.nielsen@...rochip.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] net: phy: mscc: migrate to
phy_select/restore_page functions
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 03:57:17PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Okt 08 2018, Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> > The Microsemi PHYs have multiple banks of registers (called pages).
> > Registers can only be accessed from one page, if we need a register from
> > another page, we need to switch the page and the registers of all other
> > pages are not accessible anymore.
> >
> > Basically, to read register 5 from page 0, 1, 2, etc., you do the same
> > phy_read(phydev, 5); but you need to set the desired page beforehand.
> >
> > In order to guarantee that two concurrent functions do not change the
> > page, we need to do some locking per page. This can be achieved with the
> > use of phy_select_page and phy_restore_page functions but phy_write/read
> > calls in-between those two functions shall be replaced by their
> > lock-free alternative __phy_write/read.
> >
> > Let's migrate this driver to those functions.
>
> This has some serious locking problem.
Hi Andreas
Could you be more specific. Are you getting a deadlock? A WARN_ON?
Thanks,
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists