linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] perf tools: Fix for cases where cpumode is incorrect or insufficient

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181119154441.GF18319@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Nov 2018 07:44:41 -0800
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, leo.yan@...aro.org,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] perf tools: Fix for cases where cpumode is
 incorrect or insufficient

Em Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 03:37:37PM +0200, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 6/11/18 11:07 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > Here is V2:
> > These patches probably deal with most cases except the one fixed by David
> > Miller's "perf callchain: Honour the ordering of
> > PERF_CONTEXT_{USER,KERNEL,etc}" patch, and also cat_backtrace() which looks
> > like it has the same problem, and the cs-etm fix.
 
> Are these patches ok?

Just got back from LPC, will resume reviewing these soon.

- Arnaldo